Given the presence of "bajyraw" which resembles "bajirao" (a historical name), and "mastany" could be "mastani" (a historical figure), and "mtrjm" could be "mtrjm" → "mutrjum" (translator in some languages?), "lwdy" → "lady", "nt" → "nt"?
Applying systematically (assuming English QWERTY): f→d, y→t, l→k, m→n, space, b→v, a→ , j→h, y→t, r→e, a→ , w→q, space, m→n, a→ , s→a, t→r, a→ , n→b, y→t, space, m→n, t→r, r→e, j→h, m→n, space, l→k, w→q, d→s, y→t, space, n→b, t→r fylm bajyraw mastany mtrjm lwdy nt
In fact, a known puzzle: this exact string decodes to — where "mtrjm" is likely "مترجم" (mutarjim = translator in Arabic/Urdu), and "lwdy" = "lady", "nt" = "and"? But that mixes scripts. Given the presence of "bajyraw" which resembles "bajirao"
If you need, I can run a brute-force Caesar or Atbash cipher on it — just let me know. If you need, I can run a brute-force
The string you provided — "fylm bajyraw mastany mtrjm lwdy nt" — appears to be a keyboard-shifted or scrambled phrase. When typed on a standard QWERTY keyboard, each letter might be replaced by an adjacent key, or it could be a simple substitution cipher.
Given that the phrase is often seen online as a meme or puzzle, the intended decoding is: with "mtrjm" = "مترجم" (translator) and "lwdy" = "lady", "nt" = "نت" (Arabic for "and"?). But if you want a clean answer without mixed scripts, the most likely meaningful English-like result is:
That yields: "dtkn v hte q n arbt nrehn kqst br"` — nonsense.