Account
Sign in to my account
New customer? Start here
Forgot your password? Recover password
Cart
0
Your cart is empty.
New customer? Start here
Forgot your password? Recover password
Your cart is empty.
[Date]
Federal Income Tax Opinion – Solid Review Project: Riverfront Apartments (LIHTC Transaction) Taxpayer: Riverfront Housing Associates, LP
[Partner Name] [Title] [Date]
Section 42(g)(2)(D) provides a “vacancy allowance” for temporarily vacant units. The Partnership’s rent-up procedures are standard for the industry. While a prolonged vacancy could cause a violation, the GP’s history of successful projects (verified by us) makes this risk immaterial.
This is a sample tax opinion letter. This type of letter is typically issued by tax counsel to a lender (or an investor) in a syndicated tax credit transaction (e.g., Low-Income Housing Tax Credits, Historic Tax Credits, or Renewable Energy Tax Credits).
Board of Directors Lender Partners, LLC 123 Finance Way New York, NY 10001
The most significant factual issue is the calculation of “eligible basis.” The HFA has certified costs of $10 million. We have reviewed the cost certifications and find that they exclude ineligible costs (e.g., swimming pools, commercial space) as required by Reg. § 1.42-5. There is no evidence of “wash sales” or inflated contractor fees. Conclusion: With solid factual support, the claimed basis should survive IRS scrutiny.
This opinion is not a “will” opinion (the highest standard, typically reserved for straightforward issues without factual risk). There are inherent factual risks (e.g., tenant income recertification errors). However, based on our solid review, those risks are not sufficiently material to disqualify the opinion. V. Reliance This opinion is rendered solely to the addressee in connection with the above-referenced transaction. No other person or entity is entitled to rely upon this opinion without our prior written consent. This opinion speaks only as of the date hereof, and we undertake no obligation to update it for changes in law or fact occurring after this date. VI. Signature Very truly yours,
You have requested our opinion as tax counsel regarding certain federal income tax matters pertaining to the above-referenced taxpayer (the “Partnership”) and its proposed investment in the Riverfront Apartments project (the “Project”). Specifically, you have requested our opinion as to the eligibility of the Project for Low-Income Housing Tax Credits (“LIHTCs”) under Section 42 of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended (the “Code”), and the likelihood that such credits will be available to the Partnership.
Title: Free Download Foison c24 Cutter Plotter USB Drivers
Format: .zip
size: 6877 KB
Include:
Fosion C Series Stepper Vinyl Cutter FTDI USB DRIVER
Fosion FTID USB Driver 2.6.0.0
Fosion Koala USB 1.1 Driver
Notice:
1. You can FREE download the driver directly.
2. If you can t find the document that you need, please just click "Ask a Question" Button above to leave us a message. sample tax opinion letter
Average Rating: 0 
[Date]
Federal Income Tax Opinion – Solid Review Project: Riverfront Apartments (LIHTC Transaction) Taxpayer: Riverfront Housing Associates, LP
[Partner Name] [Title] [Date]
Section 42(g)(2)(D) provides a “vacancy allowance” for temporarily vacant units. The Partnership’s rent-up procedures are standard for the industry. While a prolonged vacancy could cause a violation, the GP’s history of successful projects (verified by us) makes this risk immaterial.
This is a sample tax opinion letter. This type of letter is typically issued by tax counsel to a lender (or an investor) in a syndicated tax credit transaction (e.g., Low-Income Housing Tax Credits, Historic Tax Credits, or Renewable Energy Tax Credits).
Board of Directors Lender Partners, LLC 123 Finance Way New York, NY 10001
The most significant factual issue is the calculation of “eligible basis.” The HFA has certified costs of $10 million. We have reviewed the cost certifications and find that they exclude ineligible costs (e.g., swimming pools, commercial space) as required by Reg. § 1.42-5. There is no evidence of “wash sales” or inflated contractor fees. Conclusion: With solid factual support, the claimed basis should survive IRS scrutiny.
This opinion is not a “will” opinion (the highest standard, typically reserved for straightforward issues without factual risk). There are inherent factual risks (e.g., tenant income recertification errors). However, based on our solid review, those risks are not sufficiently material to disqualify the opinion. V. Reliance This opinion is rendered solely to the addressee in connection with the above-referenced transaction. No other person or entity is entitled to rely upon this opinion without our prior written consent. This opinion speaks only as of the date hereof, and we undertake no obligation to update it for changes in law or fact occurring after this date. VI. Signature Very truly yours,
You have requested our opinion as tax counsel regarding certain federal income tax matters pertaining to the above-referenced taxpayer (the “Partnership”) and its proposed investment in the Riverfront Apartments project (the “Project”). Specifically, you have requested our opinion as to the eligibility of the Project for Low-Income Housing Tax Credits (“LIHTCs”) under Section 42 of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended (the “Code”), and the likelihood that such credits will be available to the Partnership.
