That is a dangerous misconception.
Remember the 2019 case of the man who pretended to be a "God" to assault his daughter-in-law? The court convicted him under this clause. However, a lower court created a massive uproar when it ruled that a man who lied about his ability to provide a visa did not commit rape because the physical act was consensual (the infamous 2019 Karnataka High Court ruling).
While there are ongoing landmark petitions in the Supreme Court to strike down this exception, it remains a glaring blind spot. As of today, marital rape is a criminal offense in India. This single exception has sparked more debate than almost any other part of the IPC. What the Media Gets Wrong You often see headlines screaming about the "loopholes" in Section 375. The most common misunderstanding revolves around "consent obtained by fraud." Section 375
In a country where dating apps are ubiquitous, where live-in relationships are common, and where "stealthing" (removing a condom without consent) is becoming a legal issue, the principles of Section 375 are more relevant than ever. Consent is not a one-time stamp. It is an enthusiastic, continuous, and revocable "yes." Don't let the legal number intimidate you. Section 375 is simply society's formal agreement on one fundamental truth: Your body belongs to you.
Whether it is a stranger in a park, a boyfriend in a car, a religious leader in an ashram, or a husband in a bedroom—the presence of "will, consent, and understanding" is the only thing that separates a legal act from a crime. That is a dangerous misconception
The public raged: "Is lying about a visa not fraud?"
"Sexual intercourse by a man with his own wife, the wife not being under fifteen years of age, is not rape." However, a lower court created a massive uproar
Read the law. Know your rights. And until the marital rape exception is struck down, fight for those who are still invisible under this code.
If you follow Bollywood or legal news, you have probably heard the phrase “Section 375” thrown around. It was the title of a powerful 2019 courtroom drama, and it frequently trends during high-profile trials. But for the average citizen, the term often feels abstract—a distant legal jargon left for judges and lawyers.
It’s not just a number. It’s the legal spine of sexual assault justice in India.